Legal Opinion
IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. City of Irvine
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 2023No. G060850Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 2/6/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE IBC BUSINESS OWNERS FOR SENSIBLE DEVELOPMENT, G060850 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020-01155214) v. OPINION CITY OF IRVINE, Defendant and Appellant; GEMDALE 2400 BARRANCA HOLDINGS, LLC, Real Party in Interest and Appellant. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kirk H. Nakamura, Judge. Affirmed. Rutan & Tucker, Jeffrey T. Melching, Peter J. Howell and Travis Van Ligten for Defendant and Appellant City of Irvine. Cox, Castle…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated ProceedingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.