Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1953No. 35258Published

1Opinion of the Court

264 P.2d 751 (1953)

BINGHAM et al.

v.

WILLIAMS.

No. 35258.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 8, 1953.

Maurice F. Ellison, Tulsa, Hamilton & Kane, Pawhuska, for plaintiffs in error.

Frank T. McCoy, and John T. Craig, Pawhuska, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Parties are referred to herein as in the trial court.

This action was brought by Emmett O. Williams against the defendants, C.A. Bingham, S.W. Collins and Clarence Rake, to recover damages caused by pollution of fresh water on the half-section farm and pasture occupied by plaintiff, the agricultural tenant, by salt water, oil and other…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FiskeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Jameson v. HarvelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Gardner v. Incorporated City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API