Legal Opinion
Jacobowitch v. Bell & Howell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 24, 1987No. C1-86-1865PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA), by majority decision, affirmed the compensation judge’s award of permanent partial disability compensation but reduced the compensation judge’s disability rating of 75% to 30%. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and reinstate the decision and order of the compensation judge.
Joseph J. Jacobowitch (employee) began working for Bell & Howell (employer) as a sales representative in 1976. By 1981, employee had been promoted to assistant spe cialist, had an 11-state territory, and was in charge of five sales managers.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Polaschek v. Asbestos Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Broos v. Portec, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Erickson Ex Rel. Erickson v. Gopher Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Brennan v. BrennanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Deschampe v. Arrowhead Tree ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Gullekson v. Personnel WorldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.