Legal Opinion

Monroe Amusements, Inc. v. City of Rochester

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The plaintiff herein has brought an action, demanding judgment against the defendants, that their officers, *361agents and employees be forever enjoined and restrained from prohibiting, and in any way interfering with the regular and orderly public exhibiting and display of the motion picture “ Forever Amber ” and alleges that without such relief it will suffer substantial and irreparable loss and damage, for which it has no adequate remedy at law.

Said plaintiff, a domestic corporation, owns and operates a moving-picture theatre in the city of Eochester, New York, commonly referred to and known…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society v. Town of WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society v. Town of WoodburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Utica v. Mercon, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hearthstone Insurance Co. of Massachusetts v. Village of Penn YanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. McCaffreyNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API