Legal Opinion
City of Utica v. Mercon, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Egbert Lynch, J.
The plaintiff City of Utica has commenced an action by service of a summons and complaint seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant, Mereon, Inc., for its failure to obtain a license under the city’s hawkers and *681peddlers ordinance. Coincident with that service, it has brought this motion to restrain the defendant preliminarily (CPLB art. 63). The defendant contends that -its activities are not subject to the ordinance and, if it be deemed they are, the ordinance is unconstitutional.
The defendant, a Vermont corporation licensed to do business in the State of New York as a trading…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schlobohm v. Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Schlobohm v. Municipal Housing Authority for the YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Grundman v. Town of BrightonNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. Wile, New York County Courts1955
- Hearthstone Insurance Co. of Massachusetts v. Village of Penn YanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Corning v. Corning Police DepartmentNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Book Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. FlinnBuffalo City Court · 1984
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1976
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.