Legal Opinion

National Bank of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Bank of Vinita

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1974No. 45506Published

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice:

National Bank of Tulsa [plaintiff bank] brought this action in the District Court of Tulsa County to obtain a judgment against Irene Conine on a $45,000 promissory note plus interest and attorney fees and to recover judgment against Oklahoma State Bank of Vinita [defendant bank] on a purported $50,000 certificate of deposit issued by defendant bank.

Plaintiff bank is engaged in the banking business in the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

Defendant Conine is a resident of Craig County, Oklahoma. Defendant bank is engaged in the banking business in Vinita, Craig County,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacKintosh v. Jack Matthews and Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Howard v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Jones v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API