Legal Opinion

Howard v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1935No. 22158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was the defendant below, and defendant in error was the plaintiff below. Plaintiff in error will be referred to herein as the defendant, and the defendant in error will be referred to herein as the plaintiff.

Pacts Stated: The first cause of action of the plaintiff alleges that he was the owner of and had a special property interest in a certain described motor truck, which ownership was by reason of a chattel mortgage made by defendant to plaintiff to secure the payment of $722.88, in twelve installments of $60.24 each, according to the tenor of a certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Galbreath v. MayoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Tahlequah v. Lake Region Electric, Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Travelers Fire Ins. Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  3. Associates Financial Services, Inc. v. MillsapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Crane v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Dudley v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API