State ex rel. Thompson v. Neble
Nebraska Supreme Court
Orininal application for writs of quo warrcmto to determine the rights of respondents to the office of park commissioner of the city of Omaha.
1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.
These two actions arise out of the following facts: In the charter of cities of the metropolitan class (Comp. St. 1907, ch. 12») the authority is conferred upon the mayor of such cities, “by and with the consent of a majority of the entire council to appoint all officers that may be deemed necessary for the good government of the city, unless otherwise provided for in this act.” Section 26. By section 54 it is provided: “In each city of the metropolitan class there shall be a board of park commissioners who shall have charge of all the parks and public grounds belonging to the city, with…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- People ex rel. Akin v. KipleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oates v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Nebraska Mid-State Reclamation District v. Hall CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Polikov v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Mitchell v. Western Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.