Legal Opinion

Polikov v. Neth

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2005No. S-04-081PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

At issue is the constitutionality of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3601 through 29-3609 (Cum. Supp. 2004), which purport to authorize and regulate pretrial diversion programs. The appellees, Sarpy County Safety Program, Inc., and L. Kenneth Polikov, the county attorney for Sarpy County, argue that the statutory scheme violates the constitutional principle of separation of powers by infringing upon a county attorney’s prosecutorial discretion. The district court for Lancaster County agreed and permanently enjoined the enforcement of §§ 29-3601 through 29-3609 and the regulations implemented under the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Davis v. Municipal Court for San Francisco Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MortonNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Staley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. JedlickaNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In Re HoranSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  5. In Re Interest of Phoenix L.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API