Legal Opinion

Currier v. Nelson

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1892No. 14138PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

De Haven, J.—

This is an action to recover possession of a certain lot in San Francisco, which is described in the complaint as “ commencing at a point in the northwesterly line of Harrison Street, distant one hundred and twenty-five feet northeasterly from the northerly corner of Harrison and Fourth streets, and running thence northeasterly along said northeasterly line of Harrison Street twenty-five feet,” and extending back from said street a distance *507of seventy-five feet. The court below gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

It appears from the record that one Jones…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brandt ex dem. Walton v. OgdenNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  2. Irwin v. TowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. E. E. McCalla Co. v. SleeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Moody v. VondereauSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API