Legal Opinion
State v. Duesterhoeft
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 6, 1981No. 81-333PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
The sole issue on this appeal from judgment of conviction of aggravated driving while under the influence, Minn.Stat. § 169.129 (1980), is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress, a motion based on the contention that the stop which led to defendant’s arrest was illegal. We affirm.
At 11:30 p. m. on November 13, 1980, Russel Pettis, a deputy sheriff for McLeod County, on routine patrol northwest of Stewart on County Road 28, spotted defendant’s truck. A month earlier Pettis had learned that defendant was the owner of this truck and that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. PikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Commonwealth v. DeramoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Moody v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Commonwealth v. FarnanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- State v. SpillnerHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.