Legal Opinion

Grosjean v. Galloway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Amelia Grosjean, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office' of the clerk of the county of Richmond on the 12th day of March, 1901, upon the- dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at the Richmond Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J.:

The action is to recover damages for deceit. The complaint alleges that the defendant falsely and fraudulently represented to the plaintiff that he was the owner of twelve lots in Richmond county ; that such representations were known to the defendant to *548be false and were made with the frandnlent intent to induce the plaintiff to purchase the lots, and that the plaintiff, relying upon such representations and induced solely thereby purchased the lots, paid the defendant $300 and received from him a quitclaim deed, to the plaintiff’s damage $300.

The answer denied all fraud'and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marcus v. MarcusNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Grosjean v. GallowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Grosjean v. GallowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Jones v. BurtonNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Nichols v. NicholsNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API