Legal Opinion

Grosjean v. Galloway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, Amelia Grosjean, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Richmond on the 13th day of March, 1902, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at' the Richmond Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodbich, P. J.:

This is the second appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint. The issues in the case and the facts as they were presented on the first trial are stated in our former opinion (64 App. Div. 547). On that trial the evidence was that the defendant, represented that he owned the. lots and that he was the only owner of them, and when asked whether his title was all right, said that he was sure of that.- We held that the evidence was sufficient to require its submission to the jury. At the last trial there was evidence: that ten years before the transaction set out in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Kirsch v. . TozierNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Grosjean v. GallowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Powell v. F. C. Linde Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. Powell v. . F.C. Linde CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buchall v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API