Jones v. Burton
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Frank E. Johnson, Off. Ref.
After the testimony was taken under the order of reference, I placed on the record my then reaction to it, to indicate what the briefs should cover. The two versions before me were quite opposite and hard to reconcile, and there was an obvious lack of truth somewhere. Defendants did not call the attorney who acted for them at the sale, did not produce any oral corroboration of their claims, or of the *355alleged conversations (outside of the language of the contract) which were relied upon to show fraud. Plaintiff had corroboration by witnesses who contradicted the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Jaeger v. . KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Van Iderstine Co., Inc. v. Barnet L. Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Lynch v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.