Legal Opinion
State v. Maurstad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 14, 2007No. A04-1000Published
1Opinion of the Court
733 N.W.2d 141 (2007)
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,
v.
Daniel Leslie MAURSTAD, Respondent.
No. A04-1000.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 14, 2007.
Greg Widseth, Polk County Attorney, Scott A. Buhler, Assistant Polk County Attorney, Crookston, MN, for Appellant.
Daniel Leslie Maurstad, St. Paul, MN, pro se.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Daniel Maurstad received a 129-month sentence after pleading guilty to three offenses under a plea agreement. When Maurstad negotiated the plea agreement, both he and the state assumed he would have a two-point…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.