Legal Opinion

MIGLIACCIO v. ALLY BANK

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 27, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00307Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE PAUL MIGLIACCIO, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 1:24-cv-00307-SDN ) ALLY BANK, ) ) Defendant ) RECOMMENDED DECISION ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STRIKE CLASS CLAIMS In this action, Plaintiff alleges that the document fees charged by Defendant’s assignor, a local car dealer, violate the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act. (Complaint, ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant moves to compel arbitration and strike the class claims, or, in the alternative, to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim. (Motion to Compel, ECF No. 9.) Following a review of the record and after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Antonia Rota-McLarty v. Santander Consumer USA, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Soto-Fonalledas v. Ritz-Carlton San Juan Hotel Spa & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. MacKenzie v. Flagstar Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Grand Wireless, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API