Legal Opinion
Edward Haase v. William B. Sessions, Director, F.B.I
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 16, 1990No. 88-5303PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Edward Haase, sought attorney’s fees under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The district court concluded that Haase was ineligible for fees under both Acts. We affirm the district court’s ruling with respect to Haase’s request for fees under the Privacy Act and reverse its ruling and remand the case with respect to Haase’s request under EAJA.
I
Edward Haase is a freelance journalist. On January 16, 1985, Haase arrived at Miami…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward Haase v. William S. Sessions, Director, F.B.I.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Milton Lecompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Sussman v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Broaddrick v. Executive Office of the PresidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Mulhern v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Barouch v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Blazy v. TenetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.