Legal Opinion
Blazy v. Tenet
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 1997No. Civ.A. 93-2424 (PLF)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, in conjunction with the Freedom of information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking access to and amendment of documents in his personnel file at the Central Intelligence Agency where he was formerly employed. He also sought de elaratory and injunctive relief under the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments. 1
The case is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss in part and for summary judgment, plaintiffs motion for clarification and reconsideration of the Court’s May 7, 1996…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Central Intelligence Agency v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States Department of Justice v. LandanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hertzberg v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Logan v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Banks v. LappinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Sack v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Blazy, Louis J. v. Tenet, George J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.