Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Carlson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 21, 1983No. 68613PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

We retained this appeal to determine whether alimony provided by a dissolution decree, once “terminated” by an order of modification, can ever be reinstated in a subsequent modification proceeding. We hold such a modification may be made in the unusual circumstances of this case, and affirm the trial court on this and other issues.

After a twenty-year marriage that produced six children, five still living, petition er Richard Carlson brought an action to dissolve his marriage to respondent Jacqueline Carlson. The dissolution decree was filed February 26, 1975. The…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Helvering v. FitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. In re the Marriage of FleenerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. In Re the Marriage of HitchcockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. In Re Marriage of KurttCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997
  3. In Re the Marriage of SjulinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. In Re the Marriage of WesselsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Hyde v. BuckalewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API