Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Fitch

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1940No. 243PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioner claimed that an amount of $7,128 distributed in 1933 under a so-called alimony trust to respondent’s divorced wife should have been included in respondent’s taxable income for that year. The Board of Tax Appeals agreed and found a deficiency, 37 B. T. A. 1330. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, one Judge dissenting, 103 F. 2d 702. We granted certiorari because of the asserted failure of that court correctly to apply the principle involved in Douglas v. Willcuts, 296 U. S. 1.

The so-called alimony trust in question was created a few years before the divorce, while respondent and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Barish v. BarishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Duvall v. DuvallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Dwight v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Helvering v. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Helvering v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Pearce v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API