Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Hitchcock

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 26, 1981No. 65452PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

In this marital dissolution case the trial court divided the parties’ property sixty percent to the husband and forty percent to the wife, but denied alimony to the wife due to “the adequate property settlement.” The wife, respondent Necia A. Hitchcock, appeals from these and other decree provisions. The husband, petitioner W. P. “Pat” Hitchcock, filed a cross-appeal, inter alia, from trial court’s valuation of stock in a closed corporation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

These parties were married December 10, 1947. The marriage was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Locke v. LockeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Knipfer v. KnipferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. In Re the Marriage of ConleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In Re the Marriage of Steven Michael Gust and Linda Leann Gust Upon the Petition of Steven Michael GustSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. In Re the Marriage of FrancisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. In Re Marriage of GeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API