Legal Opinion

People v. Lavelle

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1886No. 20203PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

The defendant was accused, by information, of the crime of an assault with an intent to commit murder. Testimony had been given concerning the circumstances of the alleged assatilt. One Keeney, a deputy sheriff, who was present at the time of the arrest, which immediately followed the alleged assault, was asked the question: —

“ What was the appearance of this man (the defendant) at that time with reference to his being rational or irrational?”

This was objected to on the ground that it did not appear that the witness was competent to testify from appearances as to whether the man was rational…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Robinson v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. ManoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API