State v. Corpuz
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HEEN, J.
Defendant appeals from the judgment and sentence of the court below based upon the jury’s verdict that the defendant was guilty of the offenses of Robbery In The First Degree and Kidnapping. Affirmed.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Defendant’s appeal poses the following questions:
1. Whether it was reversible error for the trial court to allow, without objection by defense counsel, numerous references by the prosecuting attorney in her opening statement and by at least two of the government’s witnesses to the ethnic background of the defendants.
2. Whether it was reversible…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. McNultyHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CummingsHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SugimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dan v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SukaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. KrepsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. CasipeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. RodriguesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.