Legal Opinion

Levin v. Bernstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

This is a bill in equity to reform a mortgage on the ground that there was mutual mistake in that the language used does not express the intent of the parties, who executed it in ignorance of the error. The judge stated that he was not satisfied that the words affecting the meaning of the instrument which it was claimed were used contrary to the intention of the parties, were used either by inadvertence, clerical error or mistake, and found rather that they were inserted advisedly. He dismissed the bill. The plaintiff appealed.

The law is settled that equity will not reform a document on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Page v. HigginsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Barrell v. BrittonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. O'Reilly's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Thayer v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. PlimptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. O'LalorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Shikes v. GabelnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Eno v. Prime Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Mechaber v. PittleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API