Legal Opinion

Eno v. Prime Manufacturing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1945PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This bill in equity is to recover certain sums alleged to be due under a stipulation executed by the plaintiff and the corporate defendant through attorneys pending decision in Eno v. Prime Manuf. Co. 314 Mass. 686, and, if necessary, to reform the stipulation by reason of mistake. The judge made a report of “the material facts found by him.” G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 23. A final decree was entered dismissing the bill' of complaint, and the plaintiff appealed. There is no report of testimony.

1. The first question is the construction of the stipulation, which on July 28, 1941, was filed in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kidder v. GreenmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Franz v. FranzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Stevens v. William S. Howe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Perkins's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Mickelson v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Gifford v. GiffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Century Plastic Corp. v. Tupper Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. DeVincent Ford Sales, Inc. v. First Mass. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API