Legal Opinion

United States v. Benedict

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1923No. 394PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Relying upon the Lever Act — 40 Stat. 276, 279 — the United States took possession of certain land along New York Bay, April 6, 1918, and, as surviving trustee under the will of. Langley, defendant; in error Benedict instituted this proceeding to recover its value. The tract had been platted into blocks and trustees holding the title had undertaken to convey to New York City the beds of 61st, 62nd and, 63rd streets from designated avenues “ to the New York Bay,” as laid down on the Commissioners’ map. The City was made defendant to the amended complaint because of possible interest arising…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Benedict v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1920

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Straus v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. The President MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API