United States v. Gerald Kress
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether a district court may properly require a criminal defendant to pay post-judgment interest on restitution due the United States government as a condition of probation, when that interest accrues from the day of sentencing at a monthly rate of one-and-one-half percent. Because we hold that the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-64 (1988) (formerly 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579-80 (1982)), permits federal courts to order a defendant to pay post-judgment interest of this nature, we will affirm.
I
For…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Roger LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS v. ASTARTE DAVIS, Appellant; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICE, ASTARTE Astarte Davis, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.