Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald Kress

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 18, 1991No. 91-1237PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a district court may properly require a criminal defendant to pay post-judgment interest on restitution due the United States government as a condition of probation, when that interest accrues from the day of sentencing at a monthly rate of one-and-one-half percent. Because we hold that the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-64 (1988) (formerly 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579-80 (1982)), permits federal courts to order a defendant to pay post-judgment interest of this nature, we will affirm.

I

For…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Roger LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS v. ASTARTE DAVIS, Appellant; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICE, ASTARTE Astarte Davis, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API