Legal Opinion

Casey v. Fritz Carlton Hotel Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract to recover a real estate brokerage commission. The exceptions relate to the refusal of the judge to allow the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and to the admission of certain evidence.

The defendant, Fritz Carlton Hotel Company, owns, and all during the year 1922, owned and operated, the Fritz Carlton Hotel, located at the corner of Boylston Street and Hemenway Street, Boston, Massachusetts. “It is agreed that Mina E. Fritz, the President and Treasurer of the defendant corporation, had authority to act for and to bind the defendant in its dealings with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Woods v. MatthewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Klayman v. SilbersteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Green v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. BunarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Henderson & Beal, Inc. v. GlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Higgins v. Ginsburg & Goodman, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Simon v. LettiereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Bresnahan v. Brighton Avenue Baptist ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API