Legal Opinion
Klayman v. Silberstein
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 19, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The case was submitted to the jury on the first and second counts of the declaration. The first alleges that the plaintiff was employed, by the defendant, as a broker to sell certain real estate, upon the terms therein stated; that he procured a customer upon those terms; and that the defendant owes him a commission for his services. The second count alleges that the plaintiff was employed, by the defendant, as an exclusive broker with the sole right to sell the real estate described in the first count upon the terms…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Hill v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Willard v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Whitkin v. MarkarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Barney v. MagenisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Engel v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.