Legal Opinion · Dissent

Port Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. Jones

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 29, 2002No. 04-01-00042-CVPublished

1DissentPhil Hardberger, Chief Justice

The majority reverses the trial court’s judgment based on its conclusion that the train was not “in use” when Jones was injured. I respectfully dissent.

In 1908, Congress enacted the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”) in response to the physical dangers railroad workers faced that resulted in the death or maiming of thousands of workers each year. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gottshall, 512 U.S. 532, 542, 114 S.Ct. 2396, 129 L.Ed.2d 427 (1994). FELA was intended to provide a federal remedy that “shifted part of the ‘human overhead’ of doing business from employees to their employers.” Id.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Dennis Deans v. Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. OtosSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API