Legal Opinion

Mt. Carmel Mercy Hospital v. Heckler

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 30, 1983No. Civ. 82-74193PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DeMASCIO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Mt. Carmel Mercy Hospital, a provider of Medicare services, filed this complaint to challenge the validity of the new malpractice rule. Under the new rule, reimbursement for malpractice insurance costs is based on the “dollar ratio of the provider’s Medicare paid malpractice losses for the [cost reporting period at issue] and the preceding 4-year period.” 42 C.F.R. § 405.452(b)(1)(h). Prior to the enactment of this rule, plaintiff was reimbursed for its malpractice insurance costs based on its Medicare utilization rate of approximately…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Walter O. Boswell Memorial Hospital v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Humana of Aurora, Inc. D/B/A Aurora Community Hospital v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. St. James Hospital v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. St. James Hospital v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Bedford County Memorial Hospital v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API