Legal Opinion

Georgetown Associates, Ltd. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 2, 1990No. A14-89-961-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

When plaintiff sued three defendants—one on a guaranty agreement and two for reimbursement of ad valorem taxes—the defendants counterclaimed on various grounds. The trial court rendered a summary judgment for plaintiff in an instrument which never mentioned the counterclaims as such but concluded, “All relief not expressly granted herein is denied.” We must decide whether the court disposed of those counterclaims, because a failure to rule on them would make the judgment interlocutory and deprive us of jurisdiction over this appeal. For reasons that follow, we hold that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. American Savings & Loan Ass'n of Houston v. MusickTexas Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cockrell v. Republic Mortgage Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. UMLIC VP LLC v. T & M Sales & Environmental Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  5. Daniel Hux v. Southern Methodist UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API