Van Nuys Publishing Co. v. City of Thousand Oaks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Plaintiff Van Nuys Publishing Company instituted this action to enjoin defendant City of Thousand Oaks from enforcing a newly enacted “anti-littering” ordinance on the ground that the provision, on its face and as applied, constituted an unconstitutional abridgement of First Amendment rights. After initially issuing a preliminary injunction as requested by plaintiff, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the city, upholding the constitutionality of the challenged ordinance. The publisher appeals from that decision.
For the reasons discussed more fully below, we have…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Klein v. City of San ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood City, Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Mari Bras v. Alcaide Cárcel Municipal de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1972
- Dulaney v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.