Legal Opinion
Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood City, Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood City
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1976No. 75-1412, 75-3132, 75-3042 and 75-3529PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr., property owners, residents, and registered voters of Redwood City, brought this action for injunctive and declaratory relief challenging certain Redwood City ordinances governing the display of temporary signs, including political campaign signs, as violative of the First Amendment. Baldwin and Cannon filed their complaint less than a month before the April 9, 1974, general election in Redwood City. They stated that Redwood City’s temporary sign regulations had prevented them from erecting signs on behalf of a candidate…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Regan v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Foti v. City of Menlo ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Rappa v. New Castle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.