Legal Opinion
Dulaney v. Municipal Court
California Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1974No. S.F. 23006PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*80Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
In this proceeding for a writ of prohibition, petitioners, Teresa Dulaney and Joel Shapiro, challenge the constitutionality of section 690 of the Municipal Code of the City and County of San Francisco (City) declaring it unlawful to affix any notice or poster to utility poles unless permission has been obtained from the person owning or controlling such poles and from the City’s Department of Public Works, (Department).1 We have concluded that this section violates federal and state constitutional provisions guaranteeing the right of free speech since it operates as a prior…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood City, Alan L. Baldwin and George Q. Cannon, Jr. v. Redwood CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Carreras v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Joseph Cuviello v. City of VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.