Legal Opinion

People v. Rankins

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1944No. Crim. 3809PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant was convicted after trial by jury of (1) statutory rape and (2) incest. This appeal is from the judgments.

The prosecution (respondent) introduced evidence tending to prove the following facts: That at noon on or about February 28,1943, defendant had sexual intercourse with the prosecuting witness, his daughter, who was 16 years of age. At the conclusion of the trial defendant requested the court to instruct the jury as follows:(1) “The charges of rape and incest are of a most serious nature and is such as may create a strong prejudice against the person charged. Such an accusation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  4. People v. McGheeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API