Legal Opinion

Geffner v. Linear Rotary Bearings, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 1, 1996No. 9:91-cv-01879PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SEYBERT, District Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court adopts the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law set forth below. To the extent that any of the Findings of Fact may be construed to constitute a Conclusion of Law or any Conclusion of Law may be construed to constitute a Finding of Fact, the same is hereby adopted by the Court in accordance with the proper characterization.

FINDINGS OF FACT

A. Procedural Background

1. Plaintiff Ted Geffner initiated this action on May 24,1991 against defendants Linear Rotary Bearings, Inc. (“LRB”)…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. North American Oil Co. v. Star Brite Distributing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API