Legal Opinion

Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Gerson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1960No. 1486PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

On June 30, 1958, an automobile owned by Roy Stone, but operated by his wife, Gladys Stone, was involved in a collision with a truck driven by Nathan Gerson.

Motorists Mutual Insurance Company had a policy of collision insurance with Mr. Stone, which contained a $50 deductible clause. The insurance company entered into a subrogation agreement, dated August 15, 1958, with Mr. Stone, becoming thereby subrogated to a claim against Mr. Gerson in the amount which the insurance company paid Mr. Stone in excess of $50. The sum thus paid by the insurance company for the repair of the Stone automobile…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Weber v. United Hardware & Implement Mutuals Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Wolverine Insurance v. KlomparensMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Powell & Powell, Inc. v. Wake Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wendy's International, Inc. v. KarskoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Gaier v. Midwestern GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Dubose v. LoweCincinnati Municipal Court · 1963
  5. Wendy's International, Inc. v. KarskoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API