Legal Opinion

Wolverine Insurance v. Klomparens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 38,470PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff, as assignee of John J. Lanting, had judgment on trial before the court without a jury.

Mr. Lanting had an automobile collision insurance policy issued by plaintiff. The policy contained the usual subrogation clause. As a result of a collision between his car and a vehicle negligently operated by defendants, Mr. Lanting sustained both personal and property damages. In negotiations and adjustment arising out of the collision, defendants were represented by their own insurer and both insurance companies were represented by attorneys and their agents.

The collision occurred February 12,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Hospital Service Corp. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  3. Michigan Hospital Service v. SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. VaccariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Home Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API