Legal Opinion

Dubose v. Lowe

Cincinnati Municipal Court

Decided April 24, 1963No. 806301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.

This matter is before the Court on Motions for Summary Judgment pursuant to Section 2311.041, Revised Code, filed by plaintiffs and defendant, together with their stipulation of facts.

The facts of the case may be summarized as follows ¡

Plaintiff Dubose’s automobile was damaged in a collision with an automobile driven by defendant on May 6, 1961. The said automobile was mortgaged to General Motors Acceptance Corporation, and was covered by a $100 deductible collision insurance .policy issued by Motors Insurance Corporation. On May 26, 1961, said automobile was lawfully repossessed by GMAC…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wolverine Insurance v. KlomparensMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Company v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. American Automobile Insurance v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Wendy's International, Inc. v. KarskoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Wendy's International, Inc. v. KarskoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API