Wixson v. Devine
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are .stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
The action is brought for the alleged wrongful *342diversion of water, to the use of which plaintiff claimed the right, and for a perpetual injunction.
Cause tried by a jury; verdict for defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial which was denied, and the appeal is from final judgment and order overruling motion for new trial.
The record is wanting in clearness as to the precise time and point in the proceedings at which some of the objections were made and exceptions taken. It is not claimed for the two bills of exceptions set out in the statement on motion for new trial that they were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Clink v. ThurstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Flandreau v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- McClory v. McCloryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peck v. NoeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Minnich v. MinnichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Wixson v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ahlers v. SmileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Riverside Land & Irrigating Co. v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.