Legal Opinion

Stroup v. Conant

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a suit to rescind a lease of space in a building in which the tenant undertook to operate the “Birds & Bees Adult Book Store.” Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that she was induced to enter into the lease in reliance upon the false representation by defendant that he intended to use the leased premises for the sale of watches, wallets, chains, novelties and a few books and magazines and imported items. Defendant appeals from a decree rescinding the lease. We affirm.

Defendant contends that there was no evidence of misrepresentation, reliance or damage. It thus becomes necessary to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Melms v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ziegler v. StinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Furtado v. GemmellOregon Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API