Legal Opinion

Condon Nat. Bank v. Rogers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Gilliam: David R. Parker, Judge. This is an action by the Condon National Bank against E. C. Rogers and K. S. Rogers, his wife. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is an action on a promissory note. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff,. defendants appeal. The complaint was filed May 15, 1911, and alleges the execution of a promissory note by defendants in favor of plaintiff, on the 15th day of October, 1910, payable on demand, for the sum of $2,000, with interest and reasonable attorney’s fees in case of suit or action thereon.

The defendants filed an answer to the complaint, to which the plaintiff interposed a demurrer, which was sustained by the court. Whereupon, by leave of court, the defendants filed an amended answer and plea, alleging in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sutherlin v. BloomerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wells v. ApplegateOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ferguson v. IngleOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hume v. WoodruffOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kane v. . CortesyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watkins v. SimsSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  2. Casady v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. O'Gara v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Hulse v. Consolidated Quicksilver Mining Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Greenberg v. German American Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API