Legal Opinion

State v. Daniel

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 28, 1997No. 96-025PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, William R. Daniel, was charged with two counts of possession of a controlled drug with intent to sell, see RSA 318-B:2 (1995), following a search of his Manchester residence pursuant to a warrant issued by the Manchester District Court {Capistran, J.) on May 5, 1994. The defendant challenged the search under both the New Hampshire and the United States Constitutions on the ground that the affidavit in support of the warrant was insufficient. The defendant’s motion to suppress was denied by the Superior Court {Abramson, J.). The defendant appeals, arguing that the superior court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  2. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. State v. SilvestriSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State v. HazenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ZwickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. State v. CannuliSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  3. State v. LeiperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  5. State v. FinnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API