Legal Opinion
State v. Cannuli
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 9, 1998No. 97-480PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The State brings this interlocutory appeal, see RSA 606:10, 11(a) (1986), from an order of the Superior Court (.Fitzgerald, J.) granting in part the motion of the defendants, Michael and Cynthia Cannuli, to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. We reverse and remand.
On November 18, 1996, following a lengthy investigation of the defendants, Chief Investigator Bahan of the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office applied for and received from the Concord District Court (Robbins, J.) four search warrants. In support of the warrants, Bahan submitted a fifty-page affidavit that detailed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. BucuvalasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Guerra v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ValenzuelaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BarnettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. ZwickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. GoodaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. BrunelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.