Legal Opinion

State v. Finn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 15, 2001No. 99-099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The defendant, Forrest Finn, was convicted in Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) of possession of a controlled drug, see RSA 318-B:2, I (1995), and possession of a hypodermic needle, see RSA 318:52-e (1995). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to an unlawful search of his motor vehicle. We reverse and remand.

*60The following facts are not disputed. On March 27, 1998, in the early morning, an Enfield police officer stopped the defendant on Interstate 89 for having a broken taillight. A license status check revealed that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. SterndaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State v. DanielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. D'AmourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. State v. DenoncourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API