Legal Opinion
People v. Zandrino
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 2002No. A095434PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
On May 4, 2000, Peter Richard Zandrino, a former police officer, was charged with five counts of oral copulation and nine counts of lewd acts on a child under age 14. (Pen. Code, § 288, subds. (a) & (c)(1).) The charges concerned four separate victims and alleged lewd conduct from 1969 to 1971 and from 1977 to 1982. Zandrino demurred, claiming the prosecution was barred by applicable statutes of limitations. Specifically, he argued the limitations periods could not be extended or tolled by section 803, subdivision (g) (hereafter section 803(g)) 2 because, pursuant to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RiskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. LozanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024