Legal Opinion

White v. Whitney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Jefferson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

Suit on a promissory note, made by John Hugh and the appellant to the appellee. Process was not served upon Hugh, nor did he appear in the case. White answered:

1. By general denial.

2. That the note was given for the loan of money to said Hugh, and for no other purpose; that Hugh received the entire consideration therefor; that appellant was surety for Hugh, which was known to the appellee; that Hugh agreed with the appellee to pay him four dollars, if he would extend the time of payment of the note one month after its maturity ; that appellee accepted the four dollars, and agreed to, and did,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Abel v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Dickerson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Menifee v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Hamilton v. WinterrowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Wiley v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Butterfield v. TrittipoIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Stillwell v. AaronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Gipson v. OgdenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Lemmon v. WhitmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Buck v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API