Legal Opinion

Butterfield v. Trittipo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Rrom the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellant, against the appellees, as the joint makers of a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:

“$479.65. September 12th, 1868. Four months after date, we promise to pay to Velorious Butterfield or order, four hundred and seventy-nine 65-100 dollars, with interest at ten per cent, per annum ; value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws.

(Signed,) “ Samuel Trittipo.

“ Jacob M.Casteller.”

On this note there were the following endorsements:

“ Interest paid for one year.
“ Oct. 22d, 1870. Received on the within, $100.00.
“ May…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Rudolph v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Swales v. SouthardIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Bucklen v. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Huff v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kempf v. HimselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API