Legal Opinion
Rose and Lucy, Inc. v. Resolute Insurance Company
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 22, 1965No. 64-39PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANCIS J. W. FORD, District Judge.
This is an action to recover on a policy of marine hull insurance issued by respondents to the libelant, effective from June 3, 1963 to June 3, 1964, covering the vessel ROSE AND LUCY at an agreed value of $30,000 against, among other risks, perils of the sea, including sinking by collision. On or about January 4, 1964 the ROSE AND LUCY was lost at sea as a result of sinking after a collision with the fishing vessel SAINT ANNA MARIA. The sole issue is that raised by respondent’s defense that the policy is void for fraud because libelant in applying for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Howard v. Great Western InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Red Wing Mills v. Mercantile Mut. Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1884
- Pearson v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Shapiro v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
- American Home Assurance Co v. Masters' Ships Management S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Puritan Insurance v. Eagle Steamship Co. S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Nilsen v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.